Gregory Bodnar: Still just telling stories

Sat, 09 Feb 2008

3 for three

After spending a lot of time on the outside of cinemas, due to a number of crap films released in the past year, I found myself seeing 3 movies in 3 evenings, and I was happy about it. Each of them came with their own recommendations – from different people and for different reasons. I’ll happily reiterate those sentiments.

Number one was a special screening of The 11th Hour. The Monday night showing was hired out from Penthouse Cinema for use as a fund-raiser to gather support for public transport1 in the Ngauranga to Airport Transport Study. The film itself wasn’t overly surprising. Those of us who went to see it already knew a lot about the subject matter. It was quite interesting, however, that they kept reminding the viewer that no matter what climate changes occur, the planet will survive without us. A very good point to make, to remind us that we’re not above nature.

Immediately after work on Tuesday, I rushed back into Wellington, to The Paramount, to catch a 5:00 screening of Once. This was recommended to me based on the soundtrack, which we were listening to in the car a couple weeks ago. Folkloric and emotional, the music grabs on and really makes this movie stand out. It’s a nice little romantic story, but it’s so much more because of the soundtrack.

Finally, I’d dragged a friend out to see Juno. I’ve heard a lot about this one from all sorts of directions. People love it; the media loves it. It’s up for a few Oscars, and rightly so. It’s nice to see a good film on the screens for a change.

That’ll probably be all the films I see for a while. There’s a lot more to do in the city over the summer than hang out in dark cinemas. Besides, my box set of Minuit, le soir arrived yesterday. I don’t think I’ll be bored for quite a while.

1 There is a public meeting Wednesday, 13th February 2008, 6pm at St Johns in the City Church, on the corners of Willis and Dixon St.

[2008-02-09T03:14:00Z] | [] | #
[389 words]


Fri, 29 Jun 2007

Transformers

I went and saw the new Transformers film after work yesterday. Being a kid who grew up with the toys and the cartoons, I was incredibly keen on seeing a live-action interpretation. There are some good points and some bad points. This is my take.

There is a decent story being told. In story-board format, it does a great job. The build-up of the presence of the robots is well paced. At first, we’re shown some fast paced man vs machine action in the desert. There aren’t really clear shots of the sand robot, but we do get a good look at Blackout as it transforms from helicopter to bipedal form. Things are allowed to slow down from there. Until the Autobots present themselves to the humans directly, the use of robots is quite sparse. This is used to good effect. It lends a sense of tension along the way.

Of course, once the action starts, it’s beautiful. There is a bit of motion-blur, but not quite enough to start causing headaches. The level of detail in the fast scenes is pretty amazing, and I’m almost willing to bet that there was some motion capture guiding things. As Bonecrusher transforms in the highway chase and breaks into a run, he looks like a speed-skater. There were a couple bits that looked like power-slides, too. Any chance that someone on the production team is an aggressive skater? For me, it just added to the visual beauty.

The target market for this is actually a bit tricky to pin down. There are a lot of people in their 30s who are going to go see it. We were the kids when the toys first came out. There has been a trickle of attention ever since. I think, however, that this is largely aimed towards the younger market. The romantic sub-plot is a little adolescent. Confirmation of this comes when the mother says the M-word. You’ll know when you get there. Just pray you don’t have a kid behind you who’s taking a drink when it comes…

The downside of this is that the geeky bits of the movie are given a wash of stupidity by the script-writers. The whole bit about hacking signals is just crap1. The Aussie chick is a muffin and her fat friend is completely implausible, not to mention annoying. They served up horribly-written babble and only slowed down the story. It’s truly a shame, since this could have been done quite well.

A few things came up that left me a bit unsettled:

Summary: I loved the good bits. Enough, in fact, to see it again this weekend, knowing full well how horrible the first half of the script is1. There are a few honestly funny bits along the way, but at heart, it’s just a good giant robot action movie.

1 Hollywood, I’m talking to you on this one: you can’t write geeky stuff worth a damn. We, the people, generally know that if a Hollywood movie mentions “hackers” or “hacking”, the movie is going down the toilet. This is especially true here. Thank god the fast-paced ending recovers before the final flush.

[2007-06-28T20:00:00Z] | [] | #
[757 words]


Sat, 29 Jul 2006

C.R.A.Z.Y.

A full week into the New Zealand Film Festival, I finally saw my first film. C.R.A.Z.Y. is a wonderful french film out of Canada that digs into the struggles of a somewhat-dysfunctional family growing up together. Strong images and strong language dominate the movie, making for a gripping experience. It’s no surprised that it has done well on the film circuit.

[2006-07-28T22:00:00Z] | [] | #
[64 words]